Understanding Breath Test Reliability and the Observation Period

Overview

Breath test results often appear straightforward, but the reliability of the numbers depends heavily on proper procedure. The observation period, officer compliance, equipment handling, and environmental factors all influence whether the recorded result reflects true deep lung air.
Defense attorneys frequently rely on Zach Marshall to break down the technical steps behind breath testing, identify deviations from required procedure, and explain how those deviations affect the reliability of the final reading. As a DUI and collision consultant based in Arlington, WA, Zachary Marshall provides clear evaluations designed to support litigation, negotiation, and administrative hearings.

Why the Observation Period Matters

The observation period is one of the most misunderstood components of the breath testing process. Its purpose is to ensure that no mouth alcohol or foreign substances interfere with the sample.

A proper observation period requires:

  • Continuous, uninterrupted monitoring

  • No eating, smoking, or drinking

  • No burping, regurgitation, or vomiting

  • Officer attention at all times

  • An environment free from strong alcohol based contaminants

Gaps or distractions during this period can directly affect result reliability.

What Counts as “Observation”

Many officers believe that simply being in the same room satisfies the requirement. That is incorrect. Zach reviews:

  • Whether the officer had an unobstructed view

  • Whether they were actively watching the subject

  • Whether they were engaged in other tasks

  • Whether they left the room or turned their back

  • Whether video shows a loss of attention

  • Whether the officer documented observation accurately

Even small moments of inattention can undermine the validity of the reading.

Environmental Contamination

Breath tests can be influenced by the subject’s surroundings. Zachary evaluates potential contamination risks such as:

  • Alcohol based hand sanitizer

  • Cleaning agents

  • Mouthwash or hygiene products

  • Residual alcohol vapor in confined spaces

  • Equipment being cleaned nearby

  • Recent application of alcohol based products

These factors can distort the testing environment and reduce reliability.

Equipment Handling and Sequencing

Breath testing instruments rely on strict sequencing and handling. Zach examines:

  • Whether the machine was prepared properly

  • Timing of blank checks and air blanks

  • Whether the officer followed the correct prompt sequence

  • Any error messages or irregular readouts

  • Whether the second breath sample occurred within the required timeframe

  • Instrument status, calibration, and maintenance records

Incorrect sequencing or rushed steps can impact sample integrity.

Mouth Alcohol Concerns

Residual mouth alcohol is one of the most common causes of artificially high readings. Zach reviews:

  • Whether burping or regurgitation occurred

  • Whether the subject recently put anything in their mouth

  • If the officer documented any such events

  • Whether the subject made jaw or swallowing movements

  • Whether the officer responded appropriately

Video is especially important here, because it often contradicts the written narrative.

Clarity of Officer Instructions

Breath tests depend on the subject understanding and following instructions. Zach evaluates:

  • How clearly the instructions were given

  • Whether the officer demonstrated the proper breath pattern

  • Whether the officer interrupted or rushed the subject

  • Whether the subject appeared confused or anxious

Instruction clarity can significantly affect the quality of the sample.

Timing, Sequencing, and Reliability

Breath test timing must follow specific requirements. Zachary reconstructs:

  • Observation period start and end times

  • Timing between the first and second sample

  • Unusual delays or interruptions

  • Whether the officer documented these steps in the correct order

  • Whether the timing is consistent across video and reports

These timing factors often become critical in administrative hearings.

Why Attorneys Use Technical Breath Test Analysis

Attorneys rely on Zach Marshall because his breath test evaluations:

  • Identify reliability issues

  • Clarify procedural errors

  • Strengthen suppression arguments

  • Improve negotiation leverage

  • Support DOL and DMV hearing strategy

  • Provide clear, technical language for cross examination

  • Distinguish true impairment from procedural flaws

His structured reviews are designed to assist both private and public defense counsel across Washington and the West Coast.

Contact

For breath test reliability analysis, DUI evaluation, or hearing support, contact:

Zachary Marshall
Founder and Lead Consultant
Legal Limit Consulting, LLC
Arlington, Washington
Phone: (425) 224 5149
Email: Z.Marshall@LegalLimitConsulting.com
Website: www.LegalLimitConsulting.com

Previous
Previous

Common Documentation Errors in DUI Investigations and Why They Matter

Next
Next

How Video Evidence Strengthens or Weakens DUI Investigations